Critical Analysis And Strategy For Friendship Baptist Church

Critical Analysis and Strategy for Friendship Baptist Church The Non-profit has been in existence for 43 years. It was organized in response to a rift between the original organization and some of its members. Over the years, the organization has not been able to adapt and develop sufficient training and development within the new organization to foster growth and maturity in members or develop capable leaders from within the organization. The morale and level of viable activity has experienced times of growth and decline due to the change in leadership and lack of clear vision and mission. Key Players There is one formal leader. This leader was elected by a popular vote of the members of the organization. The tenure of the leader is ongoing and has spanned for seven years. The demographic makeup of the organization is varied in age, gender, social class and economics. The racial makeup is predominantly African American. There is a loose structure of administrative support and interior management. Financial elements are handled by a designated person (female) and one assistant (female). There is an elected board of leaders/servants designated to oversee the needs of the members of the organization. This board is made up of 4 males and two trainees. Intended Outcomes The base issue is a failure to communicate clear and directed mission and vision for the organization. There is also a failure to identify necessary changes to normal practice and procedures of theShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesEthnicity 48 †¢ Disability 48 †¢ Other Biographical Characteristics: Tenure, Religion, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity 50 Ability 52 Intellectual Abilities 52 †¢ Physical Abilities 55 †¢ The Role of Disabilities 56 Implementing Diversity Management Strategies 56 Attracting, Selecting, Developing, and Retaining Diverse Employees 56 †¢ Diversity in Groups 58 †¢ Effective Diversity Programs 58 Summary and Implications for Managers 60 S A L Self-Assessment Library What’s My Attitude Toward Older People

Anything in Excess is negative Oedipus The King by Sophocles

To go to far is as bad as to fall short. Confucius. Everything should be done in moderation and there should be a healthy equilibrium in all situations and aspects of life. Something taken too far is the equal to something not taken far enough; both concepts are flawed and cause confliction. These are the beliefs that the Greek gods held and also imposed on their people. Know thy self; nothing in excess was inscribed at Temple Apollo at Delphi in Ancient Greek. Temple Apollo is known to be the most sacred place in the Greek world. Oedipus the king of Thebes went against the word of the gods by doing many things in excess. He did this by having excessive pride and anger. Not only that he also he also held excessive power and control over†¦show more content†¦In his excess of anger he fails to see what is blatantly placed in front of him and he ceases to use his brain or any rationale he commits acts in haste and has little to know patience for any reasoning. He strikes the m an at the carriage for little or no reason which he does not know yet is his father; he has a murderous temperament. He dismisses Teiresias without ever giving him a chance to openly say what he wants too. He does not let Teiresias finish what hes saying because he gets too angry too fast with out even listening to everything with an open mind he jumps to conclusions and does not use or listen to any reasoning. When Teiresias calls him the cursed polluter of the land Oedipus immediately becomes enraged and tries to silence him at once with threats You are say it! Have you no shame at all? And do you expect to escape the consequence? (Sophocles, 35). Instead, if he had questioned Teiresias about what he meant by that statement or asked him for evidence. By having control over his anger Oedipus could have been knowledgeable to the truth sooner. Charles A. Beard wrote that Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad with power. This can beShow MoreRelatedThe Tragic Tragedy Of Sophocles Oedipus The King1601 Words   |  7 PagesThe Tragic Hero Tragedy deals with unexpected or unfortunate events that usually results in negative outcomes that affects the downfall of the main character in a play. Tragedy within Greek drama incorporates the time within the their lifestyle of religious and superstitions. Greek writers use tragedy as a theme in literature because it represents their civilization. Sophocles uses this theme in his dramatic plays because the audience is able to correspond to the story line. It allows the audienceRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pageschampions) but also to those who support others’ ideas (supporters) and who provide resources to implement them (orchestrators). 23. I encourage informed rule-breaking in pursuit of creative solutions. ______ In situations where I have to provide negative feedback or offer corrective advice: ______ ______ ______ 24. I am able to help others recognize and define their own problems when I counsel them. 25. I am clear about when I should coach someone and when I should provide counseling instead. 26

The Davis Wing and the Problem of Airfoil Design Essay Example For Students

The Davis Wing and the Problem of Airfoil Design Essay Among the many important decisions confronting designers of an airplane is choice of shape for the fore-and-aft sections of the wing. During the 1930s most American designers made this choice from an extensive catalog of sections whose aerodynamic properties had been measured in the wind tunnels of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. In 1938, however, one major company, the Consolidated Aircraft Corporation of San Diego, chose for its B-24 bomber a some what mysterious section devised by a lone inventor named David R. Davis. The choice depended on some unusual test results, unexplained at the time, from the wind tunnel at the California Institute of Tech nology. The B-24 went on to become the most numerous and one of the most successful bombers of World War II. The Davis section, after its moment in the sun, disappeared quiedy and with litde effect on the evolution of wing design. This situation, curious at the time and largely forgotten today, is an interesting sideligh t in the history of aeronautics. More important for scholarly concerns, it provides a useful vehicle for studying engineering knowledge in relation to design. This article is a companion to three earlier studies in which I ex amined various aspects of engineering knowledge in the contexts successively of experimental research, theoretical analysis, and pro duction.1 The intermediate activity of design figured in all of these, but   not in a central way. The Davis episode appeared to offer an opportu nity to fill this gap. In view of the ambiguity surrounding Consoli dated^ choice, I hoped in particular to learn something about how uncertainties in knowledge affect and are affected by engineering design. Engineers frequently have to make decisions of great practical consequence in the face of incomplete and uncertain knowledge; it seemed likely that this necessity might have epistemological implica tions. At the same time, as an aeronautical engineer I was curious to see whether the unusual performance of the Davis section could be ex plained in light of subsequent understanding. In pursuit of this goal, a second and related theme emerged: how knowledge grows in relation to concrete demands from design. Design thus relates clearly to â€Å"the central problem of epistemology has always been and still is the problem of the growth of knowledge.†2 Edw-in Layton has emphasized the multiple benefits for historians of â€Å"examining technology from the point of view of design.†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ Design, however, is not all of a kind; it involves many levels of activity in a typically hierarchical relationship. In the case of airplanes, the hierar chy proceeds downward, in the present instance, through project definition, overall airplane design, overall wing design, aerodynamic wing design, and, finally, wing-section design. At the last three levels, other elements appear besides the one noted (e.g., structural and mechanical wing design in the next to last), and the total design process goes on iteratively, up and down and horizontally, through the hierar chy. At the upper levels, even the form of the solution is frequently   uncertain beforehand. At the topmost level, the task o f project defini tion, as the term implies, is to translate often ill-defined commercial or military needs into a concrete technical problem for the level below. Innovation of new devices and systems in any field of technology depends on the relatively unstructured conceptual activity at such upper levels. People outside engineering tend to think of design mostly in such terms. At the lower levels of the airplane-design hierarchy, where the greatest expenditure of engineering effort actually takes place, problems are normally well defined, and activity tends to be highly structured. In the choice of wing section at the bottommost level, the form of the solution had been established well before the 1930s, and the problem was one of specifics. Uncertainties arose main ly from the explicit knowledge on which designers depended.4 My two initial questions dictate the organization of w hat follows. The first section explores the design process at Consolidated, with emphasis on what was and was not known. This section shows the nature of uncertainties in aerodynamic knowledge in the 1930s. It also illustrates how an engineering design community functions in the face of uncer tainty at a given time. The second section then outlines the general history of airfoil design to determine where the Davis section belongs and to attempt to explain its performance. In so doi ng, we see how an engineering community acts to increase knowledge and reduce uncer tainty as time proceeds. The final section then enlarges on the themes of uncertainty and growth. We observe, among other things, that growth of knowledge and reduction of uncertainty in design are actively related, even when increased performance is not at issue. Consolidated, Aircraft and the Davis Profile In the summer of 1937, engineers at Consolidated (later Consoli dated Vultee and now the Convair Division of General Dynamics) were engaged in extensive design study of wing optimization for long-range naval patrol aircraft. Production for the navy of the company’s PBY two-engine flying boat, which in World War II would be built in larger numbers than any other water-based airplane, was nearing 100, and construction of the prototype XPB2Y-1 four-engine boat was well along. With the rapid advances taking place in airframe, engine, and propeller design, a potential market existed for still-higher   performance flying boats—not only for the navy but also for the growing intercontinental commercial service. At the same time, Reuben H. Fleet (1887-1975), founder and president of Consolidated, seems to have had his eye on sales to the Army Air Corps of long-range, land-based bombers. The Boeing B-17 was beginning to demonstrate what was possible w ith such airplanes. Some e ngineers at Consolidated already felt that the days of the flying boat would eventually be num bered and that the growth and even survival of the company required air corps as well as navy business. In the rapidly changing aeronautical world of the late 1930s, a study of wings for long-range aircraft could serve a complex of purposes.5 To define the shape of a w ing for construction, the aircraft designer must decide on the planform—that is, the outline of the wing when viewed from above—and on the profile of the fore-and-aft sections, referred to as an airfoil profile, airfoil section, or simply airfoilThe shape of the wing, in turn, determines its aerodynamic performance. Deci sions on shape must therefore be made with the desired performance in view, and this requires some method for evaluating the performance of different designs. For unswept wings of the sort used in the 1930s, aerodynamic performance can be calculated fairly accurately from theoretical ideas that reduce this problem also to one of planform and section. This reduction, which is an approximation aerodynamically, affords a number of simplifications. The most notable is that it allows   the aerodynamic drag to be treated as the sum of two parts, induced drag and profile drag, which have very different causes. For a given aerodynamic lift, the planform determines the magni tude of the induced drag. This drag supplies the work required to generate the energy of the continuously lengthening vortices that trail from the tip regions of any lifting wing of finite span. Induced drag is thus the price that must be paid for lift on such a wing. Consideration while designing EssayAlthough he thus derived inspiration from the Magnus effect, his procedure was essentially an exercise in geometry. It must be admitted, however, that Davis’s equations are   themselves not at all simple or obvious. The construction on which they are based is also both ingenious and complex. Although his scheme had no valid basis in fluid mechanics, it could not have been devised without a good deal of menial effort of some sort. Whatever the nature of his thinking, Davis, like others, had to resort to experiment for his airfoils’ performance. Since no wind tunnel was available, he improvised by borrowing a large Packard car from his friend Douglas Shearer, chief sound engineer at the Metro-Goldwyn Mayer studios and brother of the movie actress Norma Shearer. He then mounted a large flat board horizontally on top of the car, to isolate his model from the aerodynamic disturbances of the car body, and tested his airfoils cantilevered vertically above the board. The measure ments of the distribution of pressure at the surface of the airfoil were made by photographing an array of manometers in the car as it was driven at high speed (on lonely back roads in Southern California according to one source and with flanged wheels on an abandoned railroad in the desert according to another). Davis’s purpose was to search out the optimum airfoil from among the family obtained by altering the values assigned to the constants in his equations. After laboriously testing a number of airfoils in the years 1935 to 1937, he decided, however, that such procedure would require the rest of his life. When Consolidated engineer George S. Schairer questioned him   about it later (after the company had learned the shape of the profile), Davis said he therefore â€Å"sat in a chair for three days considering the matter [of the value of the assignable constants) and concluded on theoretical grounds that plus one and minus one were best.†19 He did not say what the theoretical grounds were. I le then checked this airfoil out to his satisfaction on the Packard. This was the airfoil incorporated in the model he delivered to GALC1T. The comparative measurements at GALGIT, made in late August and early September of 1937, came as a shock to Professor Clark B. Millikan (1903-66) and his wind-tunnelstaff. In Millikans words from his report to Consolidated, â€Å"Certain of the results for the Davis wing are so striking that when they were first obtained, it was felt that some experimental error must have entered.† The Davis model and the Consolidated model that served for comparison (the latter with N Ð Ã ¡Ã  â€Å"21-series sections) were therefore carefully remeasured to make certain their planforms agreed sufficiently (they did). The Davis model was then retested on two more occasions some weeks apart, with the three tests showing â€Å"practically perfect agreement. The Consolidated model, which according to Millikan had originally a poor surface finish, was polished to the same outstanding finish as the Davis model and also retested to see whether the results of the latter model could be duplicated. (Understanding was growing, though a few years would elapse before it became firm and widespread, that surface condition can have as much effect on airfoil performance as the shape of the airfoil itself.) The Consolidated model, however, still showed nothing unusual.*0 The most striking result for the Davis wing was in the relationship between lift and angle of attack (the angle of inclination of the wing relative to the airstream). Engineers measure this relationship by the lift-cune slope, defined as the increase in lift per degree increase in   angle of attack. To the consternation of the investigators, the Davis model gave an experimental slope practically equal to the value calcu lated from the usual theory of nonviscous (i.e., frictionless) flow. This finding caused concern because viscosity should, in principle, reduce the measured value below that given by theory. The expected rela tionship was recovered when Theodore von Kirm £n, director at GALCIT, pointed out that the generally used theory was an approxi mate one and that a more accurate nonviscous theory gave a comfort ably higher result. A question nevertheless remained: the measured slope for the Davis model was still from 7 to 13 percent higher than for the great majority of wings tested at GALCIT and 6 percent higher than the previous best. Millikan could offer no explanation for this difference. He could only surmise that the high value for the Davis model came from some peculiar and unspecified variation of viscous effects with angle of attack (a possibility 1 shall return to later). This uncertainty was of more academic than practical importance, however, since a slightly higher lift-curve slope has no great use for the aircraft designer. Of greater interest to Consolidated was the fact that the Davis model also showed a slightly lower minimum drag compared with the com pany’s design and a significantly lower increase in drag with increasing lift. As a result, the Davis model exhibited about 10 percent less drag at the lift required for long-range cruise. This potentially usef ul finding was tempered, however, by a notorious difficulty with wind-tunnel testing: because of â€Å"scale effects† associated with viscosity, results from a small model at relatively low speeds (as was the situation in the tests at GALCIT) cannot be extrapolated simply and reliably to the full-scale airplane at the speeds encountered in flight. On account of the un usually large aspect ratio and the limitation on span imposed by the 10-foot diameter of the tunnel, the average chord of the present models (the significant dimension for airfoil studies) was considerably less than customary at GALCIT. Millikan worried, therefore, whether the differences in performance might not be due more to reduced scale than to the difference in airfoil shape.* Reception of the results at Consolidated, at least at the level of Fleet and Laddon, was apparently less critical. (Debate must certainly have occurred within the engineering staff, but records from the Consoli dated days no longer exist at Convair.) In late September, three weeks after the tests, Fleet reported the development to Admiral Arthur B.

Pda Connector Case free essay sample

An additional feature of ConneCtor is its ability to establish wireless links to other ConneCtors for voice and data transfer or to cell phones for voice transfer. For direct data transfer, the product includes an infrared port and also ships with a USB synchronization cradle. In summary, the key features of ConneCtor are: †¢ Instant communication for voice and data †¢ Cell phone, pager, fax and e-mail, and instant messaging †¢ PIM functions †¢ Digital voice recorder †¢ Enabled voice commands †¢ PalmOS application base. The History of the PDA The Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) is basically a hand-held computer. In 1984, the first PDA, the Psion1, was introduced. It could store addresses and phone numbers, keep a calendar, and included a clock and calculator. In 1993, Apple introduced the Newton PDA, which was too bulky, too expensive and had handwriting recognition too inaccurate to be successful. However, the excitement surrounding the Newton hinted that there could be a market for such devices. We will write a custom essay sample on Pda Connector Case or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The broad acceptance of PDA technology then materialized in 1996, when Palm Inc. ame out with the Palm Pilot that featured an elegant user interface and a reliable character-recognition system. By 2001, PDAs had evolved to offer many applications including wireless Internet capabilities, games and music playback. PDAs are designed for very specific tasks and environments: there are custom-built PDAs for amateur astronomers, truck drivers and teachers. In addition, there is specialized software available to fit specific needs; for example, people in the medical fields can obtain software that lists thousands of drugs with their dosages and interactions. PDA Types The 2001 palm-sized PDA market was mainly composed of two types, each with its own philosophy: (1) the PDA/Palm devices run PalmOS, whose developers sought to make PDAs simple but functional products focusing on Personal Information Management (PIM) tasks; (2) the PDA/Pocket PCs run the more complex operating system, Microsoft Windows CE, which allows these PDAs to offer 1 Source: Marketing Engineering – Lilien and Rangaswamy extensive features. In addition, â€Å"smart† phones are breaking into the PDA world. These wireless application protocol phones extend traditional cell phones with PDA functions such as email and Web access. The original Palm Pilot embodied the PDA/Palm design mission. It provided a simple organizational device, composed of a calendar, an address book and a to-do list with e-mail and Internet access. It also had a character-recognition system that worked for most people. Handspring, Palm’s biggest competitor, introduced snap-on modules to expand the Handspring Visor and allow many applications, including an MP3 player, a web cam and digital camera. These features appealed to the youth market and enabled Handspring to gain considerable market share. In 2001, Palm also offered this same degree of expandability and was able to maintain a market share of more than two thirds; in addition, all of Palm’s close competitors licensed its operating system, PalmOS. Several electronic manufacturers have developed similar devices; for example, Sony introduced Clie as a direct competitor to Palm and Handspring. PocketPCs make up the other group of PDAs, whose manufacturers include Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, Psion and Casio. These hand-held computers come with a large application suite of pocket Windows applications, e. g. , a scaled down version of MS Office. They usually come with more memory than PDA/Palms and with a range of accessories to be added to the devices (e. g. , digital cameras, web ams). However, they are bulkier, heavier and more expensive. In contrast, PDA/Palms perform basic tasks very well and, unlike the PocketPCs, synchronize with non-Windows systems. A new technological thrust in 2001 involved the adoption of wireless technology for the PDA with manufacturers trying to assess if and how to add wireless capabilities. Wireless technology would make synchronization possible without docking, making PDAs true communication tools. ATT, Nokia and other cellular phone companies have started developing wireless phones with some PDA functions. The PDA Customer As PDA designs have evolved, manufacturers have targeted different segments based on differing lifestyle and business needs. Palm initially captured innovators – people eager to adopt a new gadget. A typical early PDA user was a professional, high-income male. He was over 30 and probably worked in a technology field. Even as of September 2000, 93 percent of PDA users were male, according to IDC, a Massachusetts technology consulting firm. Another major group of users is the mobile professional. Since this group frequently needs access to e-mail and the Internet while away from the office, it is also driving progress on the wireless front. A recent study by the University of California at Berkeley indicated that nearly half of the users had a technical job dealing with computers, and the overwhelming majority of the respondents rated hemselves as technically sophisticated. To attract more mainstream buyers in 2001, companies were working on increasing the usability of the PDA and its general appeal to non business users. For example, the new Claudia Schiffer Palm (sold via her Web site) is supposed to give Palm a sexier image, and Handspring’s Visor line comes in many colors. Palm’s affordable M series ($150) targets college students and other nonprofessional consumers. It is expected that such efforts will eventually open up the largely untapped young consumer and female markets. However in 2001, it appeared unlikely that the bulk of the mainstream population would enthusiastically embrace the PDA. A PDA was still relatively pricey and fairly limited. Handwriting recognition was slow and lacked quality, and keyboard facilities were either non-existent, too big to carry or too small to use. The display screen was too small for most applications other than text display. Internet connections were generally both slow and expensive. In addition, the mainstream market appeared to have little need for many of the more sophisticated features the PDAs were able to offer. PDA Features Given all the available design options, new product entries must make tradeoffs between features. Customers want easy portability, but with more functions the PDA becomes heavier and bulkier. PDA users’ needs are heterogeneous. Those who are looking for a high-tech way to store contact and appointment data may be satisfied with the basic models that cost $200 or less. They also are likely to prefer to keep a PC and cell phone separately rather than having an integrated PDA system that could do both. Users who plan to use the PDA as an extension of a PC by creating and accessing documents, sending e-mail, and doing basic Web surfing, might consider a Pocket-PC in the range of $350–$600. The appendix provides more details on PDA features. Facts about the PDA Market In 2001, many companies participated in the PDA market, bringing in a variety of new products designed to appeal to new audiences. The market was changing and growing rapidly. PDA unit sales totaled 1. 3 million in 1999 and more than doubled, totaling 3. 5 million in 2000 (Source: NPD INTELECT in Business 2. 0).